Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools


rules:language:retroshare_test

TEST ARTICLE

THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO TEST THE LANGUAGE AND STYLISTIC RULES I HAVE PLACED FOR MYSELF. IT WILL BE COMPARED TO THE ORIGINAL.

THE FOLLOWING IS THE ARTICLE WITHOUT MODIFIERS

THE PURPOSE IS TO IDENTIFY ALL SUBJECTS, OBJECTS AND VERBS.
ANYTHING THAT IS UNCLEAR, AT LEAST TO ME, WILL BE UNDERLINED.

R E T R O S H A R E

Invalid Link
You can find me on those islands.

This is the real shit; what all the big boys use(THIS ONE APPEARS TO HAVE A SECOND SENTENCE WITH AN OBJECT FROM THE FIRST. USING A SEMI-COLON MAY THE BEST OPTION HERE. It’s fucking RetroShare bitches(THIS IS ALSO UNCLEAR, IT’S PROBABLY A SECOND OBJECT)!
Yeah so, RetroShare is not good.

Basic overview

RetroShare(WHETHER USING ACRONYMS ARE ACCEPTABLE OR NOT IS STILL TBD) is software, that allows you to create a social network with your friends(THIS WHOLE THING IS UNCLEAR, BUT IF I READ IT RIGHT, IT DOESN’T BREAK ANY RULES). You install it; create an account; generate a certificate and you are good to go. To connect to your friends, you need to exchange certs… which usually involves copying and pasting keys into other chat clients. Exchanging is also very literal; if only you give your key, you can not connect properly. Afterwards, it is all fun and games.
Contacts are split into nodes and people… yes, really1;2). You can message people directly through either the node or the person. You can assign a rating to them.
You can open chatrooms like Skype. Text is editable, so you can have huge red bold text taking up the whole window. Then there is mail, which is just email through RetroShare. “Files” allows you to share files with others, like BitTorrent. Then there are channels, which are like YouTube channels, except you have to download videos3). Then there are the forums, which are just forums but in RetroShare. Finally we have links, which is just Reddit in RetroShare. It’s not very customisable either.

Too fucking much

No matter how you look at it, it’s trying to do too much at once.
Users will be overwhelmed by what they can do. Stuff like having nodes and people separate only confuse users more. “What do you mean I have to create a person to chat in the groupchat?”
If you end up using RetroShare, you’ll probably be limited to the groupchat or the forum… the rest will just be left unused.
Something else is how it uses a lot of terms that would probably confuse a normal person. (DHT, NAT, UPnP and more.)

Plot Twist

Unlike with the Fediverse, I actually fucking used this thing for a period of time. Not just that, I had friends there with me. Shocking, I know. In fact, I was a big RetroShare fanboy circa 1 year ago.4)
And for this article, I gathered the opinions of those friends (at least those who replied to my question).
So what did I find out? Well, nothing really new. They perceive it as outdated and confusing. It’s a bit complicated to set up, the UI was hard to use (for first time users). Chatting apparently didn’t feel good.
One guy said it was only useful as a “torrent group”. Despite it not really using torrents5).
I remember one friend once said that it was basically an operating system, all it was missing was a web browser - which I think perfectly explains the software6).

The Better Social Network?

No.
RetroShare is slow7), confusing, outdated8) and too complex.
Which is a real shame since using certificates the way it does could be really good for social networking. If it removed all features besides chat and updated its UI, it would be almost perfect.
If I were a more experienced dev, I’d make a RetroShare clone just as a chat program with the certificate idea (although I’d simplify it by putting the cert in an image, so it’s easier to share). Actually, that idea probably exists as Tox.


1) ^ a And you have to manually add a “person” contact, you can even create multiple.
2) ^ a After thinking for a second, this is probably for people who want to share a node but have multiple accounts? But you can create multiple nodes so what the fuck
3) ^ a Actually, you don’t even have to include a video, so it’s more like a blog
4) ^ a To such a degree, hearing the word RETROSHARE is painful for anyone who was around during that time.
5) ^ a At least I think?
6) ^ a Let’s ignore the fact it isn’t supposed to be an OS OK?
7) ^ a Although I realise I failed to mention that part
8) ^ a Besides the UI, it basically looks like Windows Live and its features (forum, group chat, links) are all based on the 2000s era versions of those things
rules/language/retroshare_test.txt · Last modified: 2021-05-17 08:50:42 by ninjasr

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki